Home

Introduction

Self-help

Doctrine

Prayer

Recommended Readings

Spiritual Counsels

Consultation

Questions and Answers

Subject Index

Contact Me

Related Links

title

Psychological Healing
in the Catholic Mystic Tradition

Questions and Answers

Recently, a friend told me that he saw a priest at a Latin Mass who was careless about his movements. Sometimes the priest held his hands wrong or didn’t use the proper movements specified in the missal. Also, my friend said that the priest’s pronunciation of Latin was pathetic. My friend insisted that the Mass was invalid. What is your interpretation of the psychology of all this?

Outline of the Answer
• Correctness and Validity
• What is the Correct Way to Celebrate the Mass?
• What is the Correct Way to Pronounce Latin?
• What is Invalidity?

 
Qn order to address the psychological meaning behind this issue of the validity of the Mass, we must first distinguish the concept of correctness from the concept of invalidity.

 
What is the Correct Way to Celebrate the Mass?

In general, the correct way to celebrate Mass is to celebrate it according to the ecclesiastical procedures in place in a particular region at a particular time. To many persons, that statement does not sound at all satisfying. But that statement is the truth.

  

Hence, Saint Ambrose told Saint Augustine, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.”

  

Today, both the traditional Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass are celebrated in various places. The Novus Ordo Mass is celebrated according to current adaptations from its inception at Vatican II. Before Vatican II, the traditional Latin Mass was the sole form of the Roman Mass. But even then, the Latin Mass of 1962, for example, was not exactly the same as the Mass of 1950. Moreover, we can wonder whether the Mass of 1950 was identical with the Mass of 1500. Scrutiny of historical documents may be able to deduce how the Mass was celebrated at some places and times in the Middle Ages, but what about the Mass of 1000 or the Mass of 500? Were those Masses celebrated in the same manner in all places at all times? Or, for that matter, who else but Christ Himself and the Apostles knows how He taught the Apostles to celebrate the Mass?

This all points to the fact that we have no absolute rules pertaining to all places and all times to define the correctness of liturgy. All we have are fluid procedures relative to time and region.

  

Notice that even though the rubrics for a particular tradition may specify the actions to be taken by the priest, there can still be variations in how a priest carries out those actions. When the rubrics say, “With his hands held apart...”, exactly how far apart should the priest hold his hands? When the rubrics say, “He elevates a little the chalice...”, how much is a little? Thus if one priest, although following the rubrics, does something different from another priest who also follows the rubrics, it would be ridiculous to claim that one of those priests is doing something that is universally incorrect.

  

 
What is the Correct Way to Pronounce Latin?

Latin, like all languages, was pronounced in different ways in different regions and different times. Although it can be said that Classical Latin was the most elegant use of Latin, and that it set a high standard for literature, it’s unlikely that it was a universal standard for ordinary communication. In a similar way, it can be said that although BBC English sets a high standard for the modern English language, few people today actually speak English with that purity. But could anyone say, with any psychological seriousness, that American English, compared to BBC English, is “incorrect” English? Or could it be said that any dialect of American English, compared to another dialect, is “incorrect”? Variations of language may not all be elegant, and some variations may even be inelegant, but there are no absolute rules of language correctness.

So, here again, we have to face the reality that there are no absolute rules pertaining to all places and to all times that can define the correctness of language. All we have are fluid procedures relative to time and region.

Nevertheless, it can be said that Latin is the language of the Roman Church and that when a Latin Mass is celebrated the priest should pronounce Latin with the purity of Classical Latin. Well, that’s a noble idea. Yet in all probability it’s a standard that was not often met in the past and that certainly is rarely met today. Remember: it’s a noble standard, but not an absolute rule that must be attained—or that ever was attained—and so if a priest’s pronunciation of Latin is less than noble it does not mean that the Mass he celebrates is not correct.

 
What is Invalidity?

Considering the fluidity of correctness in regard to liturgical procedures and language, then where does that leave us in regard to the invalidity of a Mass? Does this mean that “anything goes” and that we should not have any standards of excellence? No, that is not what I am saying.

Actually, when your friend spoke about the Mass being invalid, he was not speaking about validity per se. The validity of a Mass depends on practical ecclesiastical issues; for example, if a person has not been ordained a priest, no words or actions can result in a valid Mass. Thus a statement about invalidity goes beyond practical ecclesiastical matters and opens up a psychological matter.

Psychologically, invalidity really means lacking in efficacy. That is, assuming that a Mass is celebrated in conformity with the ecclesiastical procedures in place in its particular region at its particular time, the Mass could be invalid in so far as the reception of the Eucharist would not be efficacious in producing the growth of spiritual fruits in the person who receives the Eucharist. Note carefully that spiritual growth is a matter of the heart. Spiritual growth psychologically depends not on the priest but upon the holiness of the life of the person who receives the Eucharist. Although the Eucharist is the epitome of divine grace in the physical world, the impure life of a communicant will obstruct the working of divine grace—and so it can be said that the impure life of a communicant will make the Mass invalid for that person. The matter of invalidity, then, is a matter of truth relative to each person in his or her relationship with God.

Therefore, to say that the invalidity of any Mass is relative does not mean that “anything goes”; instead it means that we should all approach the Eucharist with fear and trembling. 

  

Thus, if you go to Mass at an unfamiliar place and you see something done that contradicts the traditions [1] you prefer, then do not receive the Eucharist—not because you believe it is invalid because of the circumstances of the Mass but because of your sadness over the circumstances of the Mass. Moreover, if you know of places where things are done in a manner that contradicts the traditions your prefer, then avoid those places and go to Mass where things are done in a manner that you do prefer. Do all of this, then, in humility, so that your reverence for the Eucharist with your personal fear and trembling before the Lord becomes efficacious in producing spiritual growth in you.

  

Thus, psychologically, your friend has missed the point about the Mass. Instead of focusing on the faults of a priest, it would be more efficacious for him to focus on correcting his own faults, such as intellectualism.

 


 Back to the list of questions

 
Notes.

1. As with other issues described on this webpage, Tradition, too, does not have an absolute universal meaning. In a loose sense, it could be said that Tradition stands in contrast to modern innovations and refers to something that was more-or-less done in many places for the last hundred or so years, or maybe even longer. Thus a reverence for various traditional practices is certainly reasonable, even though it may not be possible to prove that those practices have literally persisted through “the ages of ages.”

 

No advertising—no sponsor—just the simple truth . . .

For the sake of truth, this is a website with NO ADVERTISING.

If you find these pages to be informative and helpful, please send a donation in appreciation,
even if it’s only a few dollars, to help offset my costs in making this website available to you and to all.

Home

Imprimatur?                                           

Questions and Answers

Spiritual Counsels                                                         

INDEX of Subjects

SEARCH                                                       

Privacy Policy

Permissions Policy                                           

Communications

Consultation                                   

Social Media

Chastity

In San Francisco?

www.ChastitySF.com

CATHOLIC PSYCHOLOGY

in association with
A Guide to Psychology and its Practice
 

 
Copyright © 1997-2023 Raymond Lloyd Richmond, Ph.D. All rights reserved.
 

All material on this website is copyrighted. You may copy or print selections for your private, personal use only.
Any other reproduction or distribution without my permission is prohibited.
Where Catholic therapy (Catholic psychotherapy) is explained according to Catholic psychology in the tradition of the Catholic mystics.